On this 1, too, O chief of the descendants of Bharata! they relate this ancient story, (in the form of) a dialogue, which occurred, O son of Prithâ! between a husband and wife. A Brâhmana's wife, seeing the Brâhmana her husband, who had gone through all knowledge and experience 2, seated in seclusion, spoke to him (thus): 'What world, indeed, shall I go to, depending on you as (my) husband, you who live renouncing (all) action, and who are harsh and undiscerning 3. We have heard that wives attain to the worlds acquired by (their) husbands. What goal, verily, shall I reach, having got you for my husband?' Thus addressed, that man of a tranquil self, spoke to her with a slight smile: 'O beautiful one! O sinless one! I am not offended at these words of yours. Whatever action there is, that can be caught (by the touch) 4, or seen, or heard, that only do the men of action engage in as. action. Those who are devoid of knowledge only lodge 5 delusion in themselves by means of action. And freedom from action
256:1 I. e. the questions at p. 252, Nîlakantha; more probably, perhaps, the 'doctrine' mentioned at p. 254 is what is alluded to. 256:2 Cf. Gîtâ, p. 57 and note. 256:3 Nîlakantha says this means 'ignorance that the wife has no other support.' Arguna Misra interprets kînâsa to mean 'indigent' instead of 'harsh.' 256:4 So Arguna Misra. Nîlakantha's reading and his interpretation of the passage are different. 256:5 I follow Arguna Misra; the original literally means 'restrain.' 257:1 Cf. Gîtâ, pp. 52, 53; see also, as to freedom from action, Gîtâ, p. 127. 257:2 I. e. thought, word, and deed. I have in the text kept to a more literal rendering. 257:3 This is Nîlakantha's reading and interpretation. Arguna Misra reads 'actions visible and invisible.' 257:4 Cf. inter alia Kumâra-sambhava II, 46. 257:5 I. e. says Arguna Misra, the safe place, within the body; and says Nîlakantha, the seat called Avimukta, between the nose and the brows; as to which cf. Gîtâ, p. 67. In the Kenopanishad (p. 220) the word âyatana is used to signify a means to the attainment of the Brahman. 257:6 The moon and fire constitute the universe, says Arguna Misra. Cf. Gîtâ, p. 113. Nîlakantha interprets this more mystically as referring to the Idâ and Pingalâ arteries. 257:7 So Nîlakantha, but he takes it to stand for 'vâyu' or wind, as a distinct principle. The sense is by no means clear. But the moon being the deity of the mind also may, perhaps, be described as she is here, on that account. 257:8 This is Arguna Misra's interpretation of the original locative. 258:1 Cf. note 4, p. 247 supra, and p. 253. 258:2 Arguna Misra says this means the five great elements, the eleven organs (active and perceptive, and the mind), the life-wind, and the individual soul. 258:3 The Prâna is at the nose, the Apâna at the arms, the Samâna at the navel, the Vyâna pervades the whole body, and the Udâna is at all the joints; cf. Yoga-sûtra III, 38 seq. Nîlakantha says this explains how the 'expanse' (meaning, he says, the operations of the creation, &c.) 'proceeds' from the Brahman. See on the life-winds, Brihadâranyaka, p. 667; Khândogya, pp. 42-188; Sânkhyatattvakaumudî, p. 96; Vedânta Paribhâshâ, p. 45; p. 271 infra. 258:4 The self, Arguna Misra. Nîlakantha says, the Prâna accompanied by the Apâna.' 258:5 I. e. into the Prâna and Apâna, Arguna Misra. 258:6 Nîlakantha derives the word thus, utkarshena ânayati. 258:7 I. e. the subjugation of the life-winds as indicated at Gîtâ, p. 61. 258:8 The meaning of the passage as a whole is not very clear, and the commentators afford but little help. The sense appears to be this: The course of worldly life is due to the operations of the life-winds which are attached to the self and lead to its manifestations as individual souls. Of these, the Samâna and Vyâna are 259:2 As explained in note 8, p. 258. 259:3 This, says Nîlakantha, explains the word 'I' in the sentence preceding. Vaisvânara is a word often used to denote the self. The Vishamaslokî derives it thus, 'that which saves all beings from hell;' see the Prasna-upanishad, pp. 167-188 (where seven tongues are also referred to); Mundaka, p. 292; Khândogya, p. 364; Mândukya, p. 341. 259:4 Cf. Taittirîya-âranyaka, p. 802. 259:5 I. e. the Vaisvânara. Cf. Taittirîya-âranyaka, p. 803 and gloss. 259:6 These I take to be the powers of hearing, &c., which are presided over by the several deities; or, better, Perhaps, they may mean the soul distinguished as so many with reference to these several powers; cf. Brihadâranyaka, p. 169; Maitrî, p,. 96; Prasna, pp. 214, 215; Kaushîtaki, p. 96; Aitareya, p. 187; Khândogya, p. 616. The latter sense is accepted by Arguna Misra. 260:1 The next clause explains this; that which is to be smelt is earth, and so on throughout. The men who sacrifice all sensuous objects, get such powers that they can create the objects whenever they like. As to 'in their wombs,' see Yoga Bhâshya, p. 108. 260:2 I. e. are so treated in the above allegory. 260:3 I. e. the Brahman. 260:4 I. e. when the sacrificer wishes, as stated in note 1. 260:5 That principle--viz. the Brahman. 260:6 This is the operation of the mind, see Gîtâ, p. 57 note. 260:7 The Brahman, Arguna Misra. Or it may be the 'sevenfold production.' 260:8 The wholesale sacrifice of all sensuous perceptions. The
Footnotes