Arguna said:
Be pleased to explain to me the Brahman which is the highest object of knowledge; for by your favour my mind is much interested in (these) subtle 4 (subjects).
Vâsudeva said:
On this, too, they relate an ancient story (in the shape of) a dialogue, connected with final emancipation, between a preceptor and a pupil. A talented
Whence am I 1, and whence are you? Explain that which is the highest truth. From what were the movable and immovable entities born? By what do entities live, and what is the limit of their life? What is truth, what penance, O Brâhmana? What are called the qualities by the good? And what paths are happy? What is pleasure, and what sin? These questions of mine, O venerable Brâhmana sage! O you of excellent vows! do you be pleased to explain 2 correctly, truly, and accurately. There is none else here who can explain these questions. Speak, O best of those who understand piety! I feel the highest curiosity (in this matter). You are celebrated in the worlds as skilled in topics connected with the piety (required for) final emancipation. And there exists none else but you who can destroy all
Vâsudeva said:
That talented preceptor, who preserved (all) vows, O son of Prithâ! O chief of the family of the Kauravas! O restrainer of foes! duly explained all those questions to that pupil, who had approached him (for instruction), who put (his) questions properly, who was possessed of (the necessary) qualifications, who was tranquil, who conducted himself in an agreeable manner, who was like (his) shadow 2, and who was a self-restrained ascetic and a Brahmakârin.
The preceptor said:
All this, which is connected with the knowledge of the Vedas 3 and involves a consideration of the real entity, and which is cultivated by the chief sages, was declared by Brahman. We consider knowledge only as the highest thing; and renunciation 4 as the best penance. And he who understands determinately the true object of knowledge which is inexpugnable 5--the self abiding in all entities--and who can move about anywhere 6, is esteemed highest. The learned man who perceives the abiding together 7,
From the truth were the entities movable and immovable produced. They live by penance 1. Understand that, O you of excellent vows! By their own action they remain transcending their own source 2. For the truth joined with the qualities is invariably of five varieties. The Brahman 3 is the truth; penance is the truth; Pragâpati also is truth; the entities are born from the truth; the universe consisting of (all) creatures is the truth. Therefore Brâhmanas whose final goal is always concentration of mind, from whom anger and vexation have departed, and who are invariably devoting themselves to piety, are full of the truth. I will speak about those (Brâhmanas) who are restrained by one another 4, who are possessed of knowledge, who are the establishers of the bridge of piety, and who are the constant creators of the people 5. I will speak of the four (branches of knowledge, and likewise of the castes, and of the four orders, distinctly. The wise always speak of piety as one, (but) having
310:1 I. e. after the identification of the individual self with the universal self, when the individual ceases to be perceived as such. Cf. Sânti Parvan (Moksha), chap. 187, st. 23.
310:2 That beyond Kshetragñas = the absolute supreme self. Cf. Gîtâ, p. 206.
310:3 The substance of this speech, says Arguna Misra, is that the mind and understanding devoted to the supreme lead to final emancipation.
310:4 See p. 296 supra. The last chapter closes what in some of the MSS. is called the Brahma Gîtâ, or Brâhmana Gîtâ contained in the Anugîtâ Parvan. See further as to this our Introduction, where the point is further dwelt on.
311:1 Compare the questions at the beginning of the Svetâsvatara-upanishad.
311:2 A similar expression to that in the Sanatsugâtîya, p. 149, and elsewhere.
312:1 It is not easy to account for the change here from the singular to the plural.
312:2 I. e. always attended on the preceptor. Cf. generally, Mundaka, p. 283.
312:3 The question was not quite from his own imagination, says Nîlakantha. Arguna Misra has a different reading, which he interprets to mean 'that on which the Vedas are all at one.'
312:4 Of the fruit of action, Arguna Misra.
312:5 I. e. not such as to require modification by any other knowledge, as knowledge of the world does.
312:6 Nîlakantha compares Khândogya, pp. 523-553.
312:7 I. e. of Kit and Gada, says Nîlakantha; of Brahman and its manifestations, as alluded to, inter alia, at pp. 105, 106, 191 supra.
313:1 I. e. that variety is only in this world, but that the unity of everything is the true proposition. Cf. inter alia Gîtâ, p. 104.
313:2 Cf. Brihadâranyaka, p. 858, and Gîtâ, p. 65.
313:3 I. e. the Prakriti of the Sânkhyas.
313:4 The great elements are the five tanmâtras of earth, water, fire, air, and space, which afterwards produce what we have called the gross elements in the text, namely, the earth &c. which we perceive.
313:5 The tree typifies worldly life. Cf. pp. 111-189 supra. The leaves and flowers, Arguna Misra says, stand for volition and action; and Nîlakantha seems to agree. The tree is called eternal, as worldly life is supposed to have had no beginning. Cf. Sârîraka Bhâshya, p. 494, 'sprout from the seed,' this rendering is necessitated by Brahman being described as the seed. Cf. Mundaka, p. 288; Svetâsvatara, p. 362; Katha, pp. 143, 144.
314:1 I. e. the means of arriving at it, Arguna Misra.
314:2 The triad, the acquisition of which worldly men aspire to.
314:3 He explains how the doctrine belongs to olden times.
314:4 I.e. paths of action, Nîlakantha. See Sanatsugâtîya, p. 165.
314:5 Namely, the Pitriyâna and Devayâna (Arguna Misra), as to which see Khândogya, p. 341, Kaushîtaki, p. 13, and Brihadâranyaka, p. 1034.
314:6 Nîlakantha seems to interpret this to mean the temporary and final dissolutions of the worlds, on which see, inter alia, Vedânta Paribhâshâ, p. 48.
314:7 So Nîlakantha. May it not be 'according to the received tradition?'
315:1 I. e. by action, Nîlakantha. Cf. Mundaka, p. 280, and see p. 166 supra, note .
315:2 I. e. they remain apart from the Brahman, being engaged in action. This answers some of the questions put by the pupil to the preceptor. As to 'the truth,' see p. 162, note 2 supra.
315:3 I. e. Îsvara, or god; penance = piety; Pragâpati = the individual soul, Nîlakantha. Brahman = 'that' (but how is 'that' 'joined with qualities?'); Pragâpati = Brahman, Arguna Misra. They agree about penance and entities (which they take to mean the gross elements) and creatures. Brahman and Pragâpati = Virâg and Hiranyagarbha (?), p. 186 supra. Cf. Sânti Parvan (Moksha), chap. 190, st. 1.
315:4 I. e. who commit no breach of piety through fear of one another, Nîlakantha.
316:1 That is to say, that of the ascetic, who specially devotes himself to the acquisition of knowledge about the relation of the supreme and individual self (Adhyâtma).
316:2 The deity presiding over the bright fortnight, says Arguna Misra. The words space and sun and air must be similarly interpreted.
316:3 Nîlakantha says 'one sees these only while one has not had a perception of the self.' He takes light &c. to mean the 'universe.'
316:4 I. e. the means of reaching the Devayâna path (mentioned at p. 314 note 5), Nîlakantha. Cf. also Mundaka. p. 312.